About Me

Name:nhoop
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

Bad Parents

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse has discovered  the obvious: "Problem parents enable teens to abuse prescription drugs, marijuana, alcohol". and some even encourage their teens "...to use and abuse tobacco, alcohol, and illegal and prescription drugs.”

Is this a surprise? Many of today's parents were mumbling members of the degenerative "Tune in-turn on-drop out" culture of the 60's. They turned their backs on the culture of their parents and did whatever felt good. How could those who survived be expected today to have anything of lasting value to pass on to their kids?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's Get Together; Reps AND Dems

There are less than six months until the election, an election that will
decide the next President of the United States.
 The person elected will be the president of all Americans, not just the 
Democrats or the Republicans.
To show our solidarity as Americans, let's all get together and show 
each other our support for the candidate of our choice. It's time that
we come together, Democrats and Republicans alike..
If you support the policies and character of John McCain, please drive
with your headlights on during the day.
 If you support Obama, please drive with your headlights off at night. 
Thank you for your participation. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Speaker Pelosi should be swept from office.

Speaker Pelosi will not allow our elected Congress to vote on offshore drilling - a vital issue.

Nancy Pelosi, an elected politician, has every right to vote her opinion, misguided as it may be, on any issue, but to use her position as House Speaker to prevent a vote that would probably support what the vast majority of American citizens want is a shocking abuse of power and no better than fascism.

She should be removed from office at the earliest. I don't know the mechanism for doing this, but I believe most Americans would support it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are we Destroying Ourselves?

"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and
lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
-- Abraham Lincoln

In Remembrance of. . .America
by Rich Carroll

Eleven score and twelve years ago 56 founders of this great nation signed a document freeing the United States from British tyranny and establishing national pride of independence and freedom that George Washington would reaffirm during his farewell address when he said: “The name of American, which belongs to you, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism” and “Here every portion of our country finds the most commanding motives for carefully guarding and preserving the Union of the whole.”

A nation was born from the wilderness that would in the coming years feed the world, give charitably and abundantly to countries in need, and save Europe from the tyranny of a madman.

Fifty-two men who signed our Declaration of Independence were devout Christians, helping to establish God as the final authority of morality and spiritual guidance to any people of any race coming here to live free from tyranny within the laws of “We the people.”

The United States is always first to respond, and the first to produce products, food, medicines and inventions to help mankind around the world. History will prove that America and her allies remained free not from appeasing our enemies to satisfy their grievances, not by dialogue or sensitivity training, but by young men carrying a rifle.

Today, as we celebrate our 232nd birthday, the citizens of this nation must take stock in how far we have fallen and examine how much longer we can sustain “One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” when we face the greatest assault in our history.

We did not become the greatest nation on earth by liberal politicians telling the world on global television that our soldiers are torturers, or that most Germans and Japanese were “peaceful”. Our enemies would have received the distinct message they could defeat us with this disloyal and surrender rhetoric; as Islam must feel they will have us if they keep doing what they are doing. We did not become the greatest nation on earth by evil tyrants endorsing our Presidential candidates. We became great by these same evil tyrants being afraid of our Presidential candidates. We became a great nation led by men of steadfast character and single purpose resolve. We did not become a great nation being led by secular humanists or liberation theology 'victims' undermining the traditional roots of America and destroying the only belief worth defending. We became a great nation by killing our enemies. We did not become a great nation by cajoling and partnering with our enemies. We used to enjoy being admired as the envy of the world. Now we enjoy being simply a part of the world, for in our present condition of anemia, we have lost our soul. Fire and swords will not defeat us. We have allowed the silent and unseen wedge of corruption, sloth, pornography, drugs, atheism, and humanism to kill our aspirations and integrity; our souls.

In our national prosperity we have strayed from those ideals upon which this nation was founded and obey the gods of entertainment and escape, and in this quest we have become unhappy, disoriented, and disenfranchised from these United States and worship at the altar of ‘duty is to yourself.’ By establishing standards of achievement open to all, to the weak, to the inept, we stopped the impetus to effort in all men great or small, and stopped all incentive to improvement, to excellence, to perfection. We have enshrined mediocrity. Add to this the cultural scientific rationality that humans are a glob of matter and you underwrite the view that we are ill-equipped to meet the challenges of a zealous, willfully determined Islamic enemy. This secular and personal challenge is the battle plan for our coming trials of the twenty-first century and we will either regain our patriotism and steadfast UNITED resolve, or we will be swallowed by the followers of Allah.

Islam’s goal is very clear. We cannot win this battle hiding in front of a mindless television screen or blaming someone else. We cannot win by listening to the liberal mantra of ‘the world hates us’, but by standing these globalists up and asking them: Who do you mean by ‘the world’? Do you mean Europe who we bled and sacrificed to save and who is easily surrendering to the sword of Allah? Do you mean the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference who is manipulating the United Nations so that they can install Sharia laws in place of our Constitution? Do you mean the evil tyrant dictators who endorse your candidate but hate America for our achievements? Or when you say ‘the world’, do you really mean your liberal party of atheists and communists who have other ideas for us under the banner of socialism? We cannot win by listening to a cowardly, yellow media and press who would rather surrender this nation than tell the absolute truth and be labeled “racist” or “Islamophobic” by a butchering cult who does not believe in free press.

We begin anew on this Independence Day by asking ourselves: Can we remain a free independent nation under a globalist with Muslim roots from another continent who says “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction?" What does this statement tell you and how does it apply to today’s America of encroaching and demanding Muslims who will eventually insist on your conversion or beheading?

Begin anew by asking yourself: How much longer can we hide from the truth? Ask yourself if you want this nation to ensure our founding principles are maintained and preserved for future generations, or if you want liberal judges who make laws rather than interpret them. Do you want to maintain the Christian values of America, or see your grandchildren go to Muslim schools wearing the required Arabic dress?

The decision about our future falls squarely on our individual shoulders. Together, we can have many more Independence Day celebrations, or we can eliminate this holiday when our new rulers find it “offensive”.

“If we ever forget we are one nation under God, then we will be one nation gone under.”

Ronald Reagan



© Rich Carroll 2008
crossedrifles@hotmail.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where is My America?

Remember when America was an English speaking country where immigrants were expected to, and did,
learn the language?

Those days are gone, and, tragically, no one in Washington cares.

An AP report says that in Miami, Spanish has become the predominant language, replacing English in
everyday life. Anyone from Latin America could feel at home on the streets, without having to
pronounce a single word in English. In stores, shopkeepers wait on their clients in Spanish.
Universities offer programs for Spanish speakers. And in supermarkets, banks, restaurants — even
at the post office and government offices — information is given and assistance is offered in
Spanish. In Miami, doctors and nurses speak Spanish with their patients and a large portion of
advertising is in Spanish. Daily newspapers and radio and television stations cater to the
Hispanic public.

So what's happening? "The Anglo population is leaving," said Juan Clark, a sociology professor at
Miami Dade College. "One of the reactions is to emigrate toward the north. They resent the fact
that (an American) has to learn Spanish in order to have advantages to work. If one doesn't speak
Spanish, it's a disadvantage."

Also, according to the Census, 58.5 percent of the county's 2.4 million residents speak Spanish

and half of those say they don't speak English well. English-only speakers make up 27.2 percent of
the county's residents.

In the mainly Cuban city of Hialeah and in the Miami neighborhood of Little Havana, 94 percent of
residents identified themselves as Hispanic.

Andrew Lynch, an expert on linguistics and bilingualism at the University of Miami, said that the
presence of Spanish-speakers first became an issue in Miami-Dade County in the 1960s and '70s with
the arrival of Cuban immigrants and intensified in the '80s with immigrants from not just Cuba,
but Argentina, Venezuela and elsewhere in Latin America. The exodus of English speakers soon
followed.

Librarian Martha Phillips, 61, believes those who speak Spanish will continue to have more
opportunities and she doesn't think that's necessarily fair. Phillips said she is sorry to see
non-Spanish-speakers abandoning Miami, and said she's concerned that the area "will be like a
branch of Latin America."

And OH NO! Some Spanish speakers say they have their own trouble with those who only speak
English.

How simply shocking!

You think that's bad? Consider these nightmare numbers from the Los Angeles Times:

1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County ( L. A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash
and not paying taxes. This is because they are predominantly illegal immigrants working without a
green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal ,
whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from
south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish.
(There are 10.2 million people in L. A. County . )


To those who whine, "we need them to do stoop labor."

WRONG! Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.

Over 70% of the United States ' annual population growth (and over 90% of California , Florida ,
and New York ) results from immigration.

29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.


Are there NO responsible "representatives" in Washington???
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dirt Cookies and Diamonds

The rising cost of food in the world leaves people in Haiti eating dirt cookies. Meanwhile, Prince Alwaleed of Saudi Arabia shells out 4.8 million dollars (pocket money) for a diamond covered Mercedes convertible.

This suggests that Prince Alwaleed of Saudi Arabia is an absolutely useless human being.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MUSLIM terrorists and the U.S.A. :

The following was not penned by Dr. Vernon Chong as rumored, but it is an important message that ALL Americans should read...as many times as it takes to understand it.

                  -------------------------------
 
A different spin on the war in Iraq :  This WAR is REAL


To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it.  Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).


The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.


First, let ' s examine a few basics:


1  When did the threat to us start?


Many will say September 11, 2001 .  The answer, as far as the United States is concerned, is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:
* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983;
* Beirut , Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie , Scotland
Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi , Kenya US
Embassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Aden , Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;

* Pentagon 2001.


(Note: during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide.)


2  Why were we attacked?


Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms.  The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2.  We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats, as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessor, President Ford.


3  Who were the attackers?


In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.


4  What is the Muslim population of the World?


25%.


5  Isn ' t the Muslim Religion peaceful?


Hopefully, but that is really not material.  There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian), that made no difference.  You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated.  There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including
7,000 Polish priests).


(see
http://www.Nazis.testimony.co.uk/7-a.htm

Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom hear of anything other than the Jewish atrocities.  Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy in killing anyone who got in the way of his extermination of the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian, or any others.


Same with the Muslim terrorists.  They focus the world on the US , but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone else.  The point here is that, just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements
-- killing all of us ' infidels. ' I don ' t blame the peaceful Muslims.  What would you do if the choice was to remain silent or be killed?


6  So who are we at war with?


There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists.  Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal.  There is no way to win if you don ' t clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.


So with that background, now to the two major questions:

1  Can we lose this war?


2  What does losing really mean?


If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:


We can definitely lose this war and, as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?


It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home, and going on about our business, like post-Vietnam.  This is as far from the truth as one can get.


What losing really means is:


We would no longer be the premier country in the world.  The attacks will not subside, but, rather, will steadily increase.  Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet.  If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us over the past 18 years.  The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.


We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and cannot help them..


They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time.  It will be increasingly easier for them.  They already hold Spain hostage.  It doesn ' t matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from Iraq   Spain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops.  Anything else they want Spain to do will be done.   Spain is finished.


The next will probably be France .  Our one hope with France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don ' t win, they are finished, too, in that they can ' t resist the Muslim terrorists without us.  However, it may already be too late for France .   France is already 20% Muslim and fading fast.


Without our support, Great Britain will go, also.  Recently, I read that there are more mosques in England than churches.


If we lose the war, our production, income, exports, and way of life will all vanish as we know it.  After losing, who would trade or deal with us if they were threatened by the Muslims?  If we can ' t stop the Muslim terrorists, how could anyone else?


The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost.  We ' d better know it, too, and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.


Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing?  Simple.  Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning.  And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.


So, how can we lose the war?


Again, the answer is simple.  We can lose the war by ' imploding. ' That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose and failing to dig in and lend full support to the war effort.  If we are united, there is no way that we can lose.  If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win.


Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don ' t comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation:


President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.  Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling.  Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?  This is war!  For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights to which we have become accustomed.  We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.


And don ' t worry that it is a slippery slope.  We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory .... and, in fact, added many more since that time.


Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?


No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war.  None of those words apply to war.  Get them out of your head.


Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.


I think some actually do. I hasten to add that this isn ' t because they are disloyal.  It is because they just don ' t recognize what losing means.  Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening.  It concerns our friends and it does great damage to our cause.


Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying.  We have recently had an issue involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police..  These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues, and otherwise murdering their own just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein.


And, just a few years ago, these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason.  They are also the same type of enemy fighters who recently were burning Americans and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq .  And, still more recently, the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally of the beheading of American prisoners they held.


Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the ' humiliating ' of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but ' humiliating ' them.


Can they be for real?


The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense.  If this doesn ' t show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in, and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.


To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.  Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.  Again, I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal.  It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us for many years.


These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort.  We must take note of who they are and get them out of office.  Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels.  That translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States , but throughout the world.  We are the last bastion of defense.


We have been criticized for many years as being ' arrogant. ' That charge is valid.  We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful, and smart that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that, with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world. We can ' t!


If we don ' t recognize this, our nation, as we know it, will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.


And, finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.


This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of the Roman Empire .  If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.


If we don ' t win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less.  They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach, little by little, on the established French traditions.


The French will be fighting among themselves over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve.  Doesn ' t that sound eerily familiar?


Democracies don ' t have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force.  Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.


And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide, that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.


Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over who the few will be controlling  the masses.


What is happening in Iraq is a good example.  Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct about the ' peaceful Muslims? '


I close on a hopeful note by repeating what I said before:  If we are united, there is no way that we can lose.  I hope now, after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country.  It is your future we are talking about.  Do whatever you can to preserve it.  I reiterate:  our national election is under way.


After reading the above, we all must do this, not only for ourselves, but for our children, our grandchildren, our country, and our world.  Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal ... and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world.


Our ' leaders ' in Congress ought to read
this, too.  There are those who find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!

Lastly, I wish to add: at the risk of offending, I sincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the seriousness of this issue is part of the problem.  Let ' s quit laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against terror.  They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the US and it ' s citizens.  Best we support them.


GOD BLESS AMERICA ,
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CELL PHONE DANGER!

WHY did I have to go to an online news source in India to see this one?

The Economic Times (India)

Mobile phone linked to birth of kids with behavioral problems
18 May, 2008

LOS ANGELES: Pregnant mothers who use mobile phones are more likely to give birth to kids with behavioral and emotional problems, suggests a landmark research into the use of handsets that may have major public health implications.

In the study at the universities of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Aarhus, Denmark, researchers surveyed more than 13,000 children and found that using mobile phones even two or three times daily was sufficient to increase the risk of their babies developing hyperactivity and difficulties with conduct, emotions and relationships. The health implications likelihood is even greater if the children themselves used the phones before the age of seven.

The findings are in line with warnings against both pregnant women and children using mobile phones by the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, the official Russian radiation watchdog body, which holds that the peril they pose "is not much lower than the risk to children's health from tobacco or alcohol".

In the study, which is to be published in the July issue of the journal Epidemiology, scientists surveyed the mothers of 13,159 children born in Denmark in the late 1990s about their use of the phones during pregnancy, and their children's use of handsets and behavior up to the age of seven.

The findings show that women who used mobile phones were 54 per cent more likely to have children with behavioral problems, and that the likelihood increased with the amount of potential exposure to the radiation, The Independent daily of Britain said. However, researchers warned that the results "should be interpreted with caution" and needs to be verified by further studies, the report said.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Vs. Drudge

The Drudge Report, with a  typical far-leftist "news" media twist of what happened, brays that "27% OF REPUBLICAN VOTERS AGAINST MCCAIN IN NORTH CAROLINA...".  Evidently enjoying the cheap thrill of denigrating a Republican, he underlines that with a second headline, immediately below the first, "23% GO AGAINST MCCAIN IN INDIANA...".

Drudge then nails his obvious bias with a third head, located in line with the first two, "REPUBLICANS ON HILL SHELLSHOCKED AND BROKE...", clearly suggesting that their problem is McCain.

This house of cards is easily blown away by going to the websites themselves. The first two are pages of ABC NEWS. Both just show the Republican Primary Results in the two states that just voted.

The first, "27% OF REPUBLICAN VOTERS AGAINST MCCAIN IN NORTH CAROLINA..." reads:

Candidate        votes        %
McCain            381,138    73%       
Huckabee        62,917    12%       
Paul                40,275    8%       
No
Preference    20,305    4     


The second, "23% GO AGAINST MCCAIN IN INDIANA..." tells us:

McCain            318,374    77%   
Huckabee        41,063    10%   
Paul                31,557    8%       
Romney            19,507    5%   


Oh My GOODNESS! McCain was the clear winner in NC, and did even better in Indiana. And the article on the "Shell-shocked Republicans on the Hill", does not even mention McCain. Rather, it tells of their fear that their party's lack of a clear message of necessary change will cost them seats in the next election. Being typical Washington politicians, this is all they care about.

So...contrary to the impression Drudge sweated over, McCain looks pretty good. If any of the hard line (meaning "hard-headed") Republicans who have threatened to vote Democratic in this fall's election to show their disdain for the more centrist McCain, will get what they truly deserve, "President Barack H.Obama." Unfortunately, millions of decent Americans will suffer the same fate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Non-Partisan Common Sense

    
 
...And remember: "The Price of Liberty Is Eternal Vigilence"
 
....545 PEOPLE 
By Charlie Reese - In a reprint article from the Orlando Sentinel
 
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then 
campaign against them. 
 
Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are 
against deficits, we have deficits? 
 
Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and 
high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes? 
 
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does. 
 
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. 
The House of Representatives does. 
 
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does. 
 
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does. 
 
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does. 
 
One hundred Senators, 435 Congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court 
justices - 545 human beings out of the 300 million - are directly, legally, 
morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague 
this country. 
 
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was 
created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty 
to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. 
 
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They 
have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a Senator, a 
Congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if 
they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the 
power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the 
legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes. 
 
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what 
they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of 
party. 
 
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of 
gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up 
and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only 
propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. 
 
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole 
responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving 
appropriations and taxes. Who is the Speaker of the House? She is the 
leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the 
President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they 
can pass it over his veto if they agree to by a 2/3 margin. 
 
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 
people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and 
irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not 
traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth 
that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must 
follow that what exists is what they want to exist. 
 
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. 
 
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. 
 
If the Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ . 
 
If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not 
available to the people, it's because they want it that way. 
 
There are no insoluble government problems. 
 
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and 
whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can 
reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom 
they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief 
that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," 
or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. 
 
Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. 
 
They, and they alone, have the power. 
 
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their 
bosses - provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees. 
 
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess! 
 
Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper. 
 
 
What you do with this article now that you have read it is up to you, though 
you appear to have several choices. 
 
1. You can send this to everyone in your address book, and hope "they" do 
something about it. 
 
2. You can agree to "vote against" everyone that is currently in office, 
knowing that the process will take several years. 
 
3. You can decide to "run for office" yourself and agree to do the job 
properly. 
 
4. Lastly, you can sit back and do nothing, or re-elect the current bunch. 
 
YOU DECIDE
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick

Teddy Roosevelt's policy of, "Speak softly and carry a big stick" made America great. Today, my once-proud country passively crouches behind business interests rather than stand up to China's murderous repression of Tibetans fed up with Chinese domination that is destroying their heritage. It is a tragedy that cowardly western countries must watch Tibetan monks to see what courage is all about.

I am ashamed. I can only hope that we may screw up enough guts to boycott the upcoming games in Beijing.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Organ Transplant Vs. Bureaucracy

I am angry at the DAMN bureaucrat who made the ruling that is killing a lovely person who is struggling to live - a delightful young woman who is well along the road to recovery from acute alcoholism. She's been active in the A.A. program of recovery for several months and it's obvious to we who know her that it's working.

What isn't working is her liver. Her skin is the deepest yellow I've ever seen. She's in and out of hospitals weekly. Those who know of such things tell me that her chances of survival is slim without a liver transplant. But she can't get one.

She can't get one because an arbitrary bureaucratic ruling says she must wait until July. Can she live that long in her present condition? Maybe.
 
She's the kind of person that everyone wants to help, but tragically cannot. She doesn't weep or whine. She grits her teeth and says that she lives "One day at a time." Many of us are praying for her.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Sen. Obama

The media is having a field-day with Obama's clever retort, "If I am not ready, how is it that you think I should be such a great vice president?

How come no one has come up with the obvious reply, "Because, young man,  as VP, you'd be in the best position to learn from a professional."

(tee,hee)

Tags: obama   funny  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | Trackbacks